Verbal Violence and Hate Speech Related to Political Conflict Facebook Comments as Example
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research seeks to investigate instances of verbal abuse and hate speech on social media platforms in the context of political conflicts in the Kurdistan Region. The primary objective is to understand the use and prevalence of such hostile language among social media users, particularly on Facebook, within discussions related to political issues. Employing a mixed-methods approach, the study integrates netnography and content analysis methodologies. A total of five prominent Facebook posts were selected as the sample, with 100 comments randomly extracted from each post using the Export Comments website. The significance of this study lies in its contribution to understanding the prevalence and implications of hostile and disparaging language employed by Facebook users engaging in political discourse. The analysis of 500 comments revealed a high incidence of violent and hateful language, including threats, insults, defamation, and expressions of political hatred. These comments often reflected deep political divisions and animosity among party supporters, frequently dehumanizing political figures and utilizing social stigma to demean and condemn them. The findings demonstrate that the intensity of political conflict is mirrored in the language used by social media users. Most comments not only rejected the content and individuals associated with the posts but also employed aggressive and divisive rhetoric, posing a potential threat to social and political cohesion. According to the theoretical frameworks applied, such written threats carry the risk of incitement, potentially escalating into physical violence, destruction, or even the assassination of targeted individuals or party members in the Kurdistan Region.
Downloads
Article Details
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0b52d/0b52d46edc111e449a0fbf055f579b35f69999ca" alt="Creative Commons License"
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Agapoglou, T., Mouratoglou, N., Tsioumis, K., & Bikos, K. (2021). Combating Online Hate Speech through Critical Digital Literacy: Reflections from an Emancipatory Action Research with Roma Youths. International Journal of Learning and Development, 11(2), 104120-104120.
Al Ghazali, F. (2007). Critical discourse analysis: How can awareness of CDA influence teaching techniques?. University of Salford Manchester. Available at: http://usir.salford.ac.uk/id/eprint/22590/
Bahador, B. (2021). Countering hate speech. In The Routledge Companion to Media Disinformation and Populism(pp. 507-518). Routledge.
Bahador, B., Kerchner, D., Bacon, L., & Menas, A. (2019). Monitoring hate speech in the US media.
Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (Fifth edition.). Oxford University Press.
Cambridge Dictionary (2023). Slave. {Online}. Last accessed 20 July 2023 at: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/slave
Creswell, John., W. (2014). Research Design, Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 4th edition. Sage publications. London
Faiq, A. M., & Noori, M. S. (2022). Hate Speech Forms and Implications in English and Kurdish Social Media. Journal of University of Human Development, 8(4), 80-88.
Fairclough, N. (1992) Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse : textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge
Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical discourse analysis : the critical study of language (2nd ed.). Routledge. London and Newyork.
Fink, C. (2018). Dangerous speech, anti-Muslim violence, and Facebook in Myanmar. Journal of International Affairs, 71(1.5), 43-52.
Fitzpatrick, M. (2008). Stigma. British Journal of General Practice, 58(549), 294–294. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp08X280092
Goffman E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs. United States of America.
Green Gill. (2009). The End of Stigma? Changes in the social experience of long-term illness. First Published. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. London and New York.
Guedes, E., Sancassiani, F., Carta, M. G., Campos, C., Machado, S., King, A. L. S., & Nardi, A. E. (2016). Internet addiction and excessive social networks use: What about Facebook? Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health: CP & EMH, 12, 43-48.
Jay, T. (1992). Cursing in America a psycholinguistic study of dirty language in the courts, in the movies, in the schoolyards and on the streets. Philadelphia: J. Benjamins Pub. Co.
Jay, T. (2009). The Utility and Ubiquity of Taboo Words. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(2), 153–161. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01115.x
Kozinets, R, V., Earley, A., & Dolbec, P.-Y. (2013). Netnographic Analysis: Understanding Culture Through Social Media Data. The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis(pp. 262–276). SAGE Publications, Limited. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446282243.n18
Kozinets, R. (2017). Netnography: Radical participative understanding for a networked communications society. The SAGE handbook of qualitative research in psychology, 374.
Kozinets, R. V. (2002). The Field behind the Screen: Using Netnography for Marketing Research in Online Communities. Journal of Marketing Research, 39(1), 61–72. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1558584
Kusow Adil M. (2015). Stigma. {Online}. Last accessed 23 December 2022 at: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118663202.wberen316
Machin, D., & Mayr, A. (2012). How to do critical discourse analysis: A Multimodal Introduction. Los Angeles: Sage.
Mertens, Donna. M. (2010). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. 3rd edition. Sage publications. London.
Paasch-Colberg, S., Strippel, C., Trebbe, J., & Emmer, M. (2021). From insult to hate speech: Mapping offensive language in German user comments on immigration. Media and Communication, 9(1), 171-180.
Snowdon, & Eklund. K, L. (2021). A Critical Discourse Analysis of Representations of Travellers in Public Policies in Ireland. Societies (Basel, Switzerland), 11(1), 14–. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc11010014
Stemler, Steve (2001) "An overview of content analysis," Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation: Vol. 7, Article 17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7275/z6fm-2e34
Sternberg, R. J. (2003). A duplex theory of hate: Development and application to terrorism, massacres, and genocide. Review of General Psychology, 7(3), 299–328.
Sternberg, R. J. & Sternberg, K. (2008). The nature of Hate. 1st published. Cambridge university press. Cambridge. UK.
Tannen, D., Hamilton, H. E., & Schiffrin, D. (2015). The handbook of discourse analysis (Vol. 1). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
van Dijk, T. A. (1997). What is political discourse analysis? Political linguistics, ed. By Jan Blommaert and Chris Bulcean, 11–52. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Waluati Triana, H., Sastra, G., & Reflinaldi. (2019). ‘Social Practice In Facebook: Critical Discourse Analysis In The Process of Text Production’. Proceeding of The 4th International Seminar on Linguistics (ISOL-4), pp. 105–10. Sciendo: Warsaw, Poland. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/9783110680027-015 .