Novel Metaphor Recognition, Interpretation and Construction: Barriers Face Kurds as Non-native English Speakers

Main Article Content

Bikhtiyar O. Fattah

Abstract

This study which is titled ‘Novel Metaphor Recognition and Interpretation:   Barriers Face Kurds as Non-native English speakers’ considers the recognition and the interpretation process difficulty of English novel metaphors. Novel metaphor is one of the most problematic types of metaphor in which its creation, recognition and interpretation usually require a higher level of efficiency. This sort of metaphor is highly connected with personal established conceptual systems which probably cause misunderstanding among interactants: native and non-native ones. This study aims at identifying novel metaphor, determining the nature of problems that Kurds as non-native English speakers face in recognizing novel metaphors in English. Thus, it would be helpful for both non-native English learners and speakers to improve their English comprehension and construction competence. The current study makes use of both quantitative and qualitative approach in the process of data analysis; and it has come up with the conclusion that the insufficiency in English communicative language competence, cognitive analysis proficiency, and background knowledge are three main problems in the process of recognizing and interpreting novel metaphors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Fattah, B. O. (2024) “Novel Metaphor Recognition, Interpretation and Construction: Barriers Face Kurds as Non-native English Speakers ”, Koya University Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 6(1), pp. 259-270. doi: 10.14500/kujhss.v6n1y2023.pp259-270.
Section
Articles
Author Biography

Bikhtiyar O. Fattah, Department of English, Faculty of Education, Koya University, Kurdistan Region, Iraq

Bikhtiyar Omar Fattah is an assistant professor of Linguistics & English Language at the Department of English Language/ Faculty of Education/ Koya University.
He was born on September 1, 1981 in Koya / Erbil. He got B.A. degree at Sallahaddin University, and got M.A. at Koya University. He attended and participated in many national and international English language and English linguistic courses, conferences, workshops and training courses; namely at: Huddersfield University, Sheffield Hallam University, Loughborough University/ the United Kingdom; Virginia Tech / USA; and Bilkent University/ Turkey, in addition to the almost all university in the Iraqi Kurdistan Region.

His research interests focus on Sociolinguistics, Discourses Analysis, Politeness and Applied Linguistics. He is a member of the Politeness Research Group.    

References

Boeynaems A., Burgers C., Konijn E.A., and Steen, G. J. (2017). The Impact of Conventional

and Novel Metaphors in News on Issue Viewpoint. International Journal of

Communication, 11(2017), 2861–2879.

Camac, M.K. and Glucksberg, S. (1984). Metaphors do not use associations between

concepts, they are used to create them. Journal of psycholinguistic research, 13(6),

-455.

Deignan, A. (2005). Metaphor and Corpus Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing

Company.

Fattah, B.O. (2016). Reconsidering the Notion of Culture in Connection to Language Studies.

International Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies, 3(1), 407-420.

Fattah, B.O. and Salih, S.M. (2022). Colloquialism and the Community of Practice. Koya

University Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 5(1), 77-84.

...........2023. Drawing a Demarcation Line between Two Overlapping Colloquial Elements:

The Case of Idioms and Clichés. Koya University Journal of Humanities and Social

Sciences, 6(1), 65-76.

Fauconnier, G. and Turner, M. (1998). Conceptual Integration Networks. Cognitive Science,

(2):133–187.

Giora, R., Fein, O., Kronrod, A., Elnatan, I., Shuval, N., & Zur, A. (2004). Weapons of Mass

Distractions: Optimal Innovation and Pleasure Ratings. Metaphor and Symbol, 19(2),

–141.

Glaholt, M. G., and Reingold, E. M. (2011). Eye Movement Monitoring as a Process Tracing

Methodology in Decision Making Research. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and

Economics, 4 (2), 125–146.

Hoeken, H., Swanepoel, P., Saal, E., & Jansen, C. (2009). Using Message Form to Stimulate

Conversations: The Case of Tropes. Communication Theory, 19(1), 49–65.

Indurkhya, B. 1992. Metaphor and Cognition: Studies in Cognitive Systems. Dordrecht:

Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Jansen, C., van Nistelrooij, M., Olislagers, K., van Sambeek, M., & de Stadler, L. (2010). A

Fire Station in Your Body: Metaphors in Educational Texts on HIV/AIDS. Southern

African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 28(2), 133–139.

Kronfeld, C. (1980). Novel and Conventional Metaphors: A Matter of Methodology. Poetics

Today, 2(1b), 13-24.

Lakoff, M., and Johnson, M. (1980).Metaphors We Live By. NewYork: University of

Chicago Press

Littlemore, J., Chen, P., Trautman K., and Barnden, J. (2011) Difficulties in Metaphor

Comprehension Faced by International Students whose First Language is not

English. Applied Linguistics, 32(4). 408–429.

Orthony, A. (1993) Metaphor, Language and Thought. In Andrew Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and

Thought. Cambridge University Press. 1-18.

Knoblich, G., Ohlsson, S., and Raney, G. E. (2001). An Eye Movement Study of Insight

Problem Polving. Memory and Cognition, 29(7), 1000–1009.

Rayner, K. (1998). Eye Movements in Reading and Information Processing: 20 Years

of Research. Psychological bulletin, 124(3), 372–422

Read, S. J., Cesa, I. L., Jones, D. K., & Collins, N. L. (1990). When is the federal budget like

a baby? Metaphor in political rhetoric. Metaphor and Symbol, 5(3), 125–149.

Searle, J. (1979) 'Metaphor', in A. Ortony (ed.) Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge:

Cambridge University Press, 92–123.

Steen,G. J. (2007) Finding Metaphor in Grammar and Usage: A Methodological Analysis of

theory and Research. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Terai, A., Nakagawa, M., Kusumi, T., Koike, Y., & Jimura, K. (2015). Enhancement of visual

attention precedes the emergence of novel metaphor interpretations. Frontiers in

Psychology, 6, 892–892.

Turner, M., and Fauconnier, G. (1999). A mechanism of creativity. Poetics Today

(3), 397–418

Veale, T. and Hao, Y. (2008). A fluid knowledge representation for understanding and

generating creative metaphors. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference

on Computational Linguistics,Volume 1, 945–952.