Violence in Sarah Ruhl’s in the Next Room
Main Article Content
Abstract
Sarah Ruhl’s In the Next Room or The Vibrator Play investigates the causes of violence against women that constitutes any act of gender-based violence that results in physical, sexual, or psychological harm or suffering to women. Ruhl uses historical facts to make a connection between the events that occurred in the past and the present. This study aims to examine the problem of violence and its effects on women. The study tries to analyze the types of violence based on Johan Galtung’s theory of Violence Triangle as a method of analysis. In his seminal article, Violence, Peace, and Peace Research (1969), Galtung presents his famous theory of the Violence Triangle, which is the best framework for comprehending the concept of violence. He made a distinction between three categories of violence: direct, structural, and cultural violence. This classification enables the examination of many types of violence. According to Galtung, "violence is present when human beings are being influenced so that their actual somatic and mental realizations are below their potential realizations" (Galtung 1969, p. 168). Galtung says that scholars should look at how violence is used to keep people from doing what they want in their daily lives, not just how it affects their bodies. The ultimate goal of this study is to show those causes of violence that result in various types of suffering for women and also to analyze the types of violence in the play under study.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Atack, I., (2005) Peace Studies and Social Change: The Role of the Ethics and Human Agency. Dublin: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 1-13.
Barker, B. G., (2000) The Horrors of the Half-Known Life: Male Attitudes Toward Women and Sexuality in Nineteenth Century America. S.l.: Routledge
Bechtel, R., (2007) Past Performance: American Theatre and the Historical Imagination. Bucknell UP
Cott, N. F., (1978) Passion lessness: An Interpretation of Victorian Sexual Ideology, 1790-1850. (4), pp. 219-36.
Ellul, J., (1964) The Technological Society. New York: Vintage
Essinec, (2013) Descriptions of Sarah Ruhl’s In the Next Room or The Vibrator Play. Nashville Theatre and Performance Criticism. Vanderbilt University, p, 1.
Galtung, J., (1969) Violence, Peace and Peace Research. Journal of Peace Research, 6(3), pp. 167-191.
Galtung, J., (1990) Cultural Violence. Journal of Peace Research, 27(3), pp.291-305.
Heidegger, M., (1994) Basic Questions of Philosophy: Selected “Problems” of “Logic.” Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Maines, R. P., (1999) The Technology of Orgasm: “Hysteria,” the Vibrator, and Women’s Sexual Satisfaction. The Johns Hopkins UP
Rowen, B., (2018) Undigested Reading: Rethinking Stage Directions through Affect. Theatre Journal, [e-journal] (70), pp. 307-26.
Royce, G., (2012) In the Next Room Produces a Warm Buzz. Star Tribune. Available at: http://www.startribune.com/entertainment/stageandarts/177096361.html . [Accessed 12 May 2017].
Ruhl, S., (2009) In the Next Room or The Vibrator Play. New York: Theatre Communications Group.
Simmons, D. D., (2016) Interpreting the Costume Designs of in the Next Room through Victorian Fashions of the 1890s. Virginia Commonwealth University. Available at: https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd/4277
Welch, H., (2012) Sarah Ruhl: A comprehensive Analysis of The Clean House, Eurydice, passion play, Dead man’s cell phone, and in the next room or the vibrator play. Texas tech university.
Zeigler, S. L., (1996) Wifely Duties: Marriage, Labor, and the Common Law. (20), pp. 63-96. [Online] Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1171504 [Accessed 21 November 2019].