Pragmatism and Religion
Main Article Content
Abstract
Theism is partly based on testimonial evidence, and partly on philosophical arguments for the existence of a supreme being. Testimony is an invaluable source of evidence. Had it not been for the testimony of others and our tendency to accept it as a source of knowledge, learning would have been hampered in ways that would have impacted the speed of human progress. When we read a book, we normally learn new things through accepting the testimony of the author, and we tend to accept testimony as evidence only if we find it intuitively plausible, and if the testifier is reliable. Theistic discourse implies that religious messengers, by virtue of their excellent moral character, had a privileged access to truth. This article argues that even if we accept that they were morally excellent and perfectly honest in their testimonies, it still does not follow from this that they knew the truth or that they reported the truth to us. It could be the case that they were completely honest in their testimonies, and reported to us what they thought the truth was, not what the truth really was. The aim of this article is to examine the epistemic force of religious testimony and theistic belief in light of pragmatism.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Audi, R. (2008). "Belief, Faith, and Acceptance", International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 63(1/3): pp. 87-102.
Clifford, W. (1999). The Ethics of Belief. New York: Prometheus Books.
Cohen, J. (1992). An Essay on Belief and Acceptance. New York: Oxford University Press.
Dewey, J. (1903). Studies in Logical Theory. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Engel, P. (ed.) (2000). Believing and Accepting. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Hume, D. (1977). An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Indiannapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.
James, W. (2007). The Principles of Psychology, Vol. 2. New York: Cosimo Classics.
James, W. (1907). Pragmatism: A New Name For Some Old Ways Of Thinking. New York: Longman, Green and Co.
Lackey, J. and Sosa, E. (eds.) (2006). The Epistemology of Testimony. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Peirce, C. (1878). "How to Make Our Ideas Clear," Popular Science Monthly, 12: pp. 286-302.
Russell, B. (2009). Philosophical Essays. London: Routledge
Russell, B. (1921). Unpopular Essays. London: Ruskin House.
Ryle, G. (2000). The Concept of Mind. London: Penguin Books.
Sosa, E. and Villanueva, E. (eds.) (2004). Epistemology: Philosophical Issues. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Swinburne, R. (2001). Epistemic Justification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Voltaire, M. (1768). Epistle to the Author of "The Three Impostors”.