Social Cooperation Among Religious Communities in The Kurdistan Region
It Is a Field Study in Erbil Governorate
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14500/kujhss.v8n2y2025.pp1-15Keywords:
Social Assistance, religious communities, Religion, Multi-Religious, Kurdistan RegionAbstract
This study examines social cooperation among religious communities in the Kurdistan Region. The method used is a descriptive social survey. The research community includes various religious communities living in Erbil Governorate, such as Islam, Christianity, Kakayi, Judaism, Zoroastrianism, Baha'i, Saiba Mandaue, and Yazidi. The community consists of 384 people, comprising 204 males and 180 females. Due to the differences in the characteristics of the study sample, non-probability sampling, specifically quota sampling, was employed. The objectives of the study are as follows: 1) determine the rate of trust among the religious communities within the study sample, 2) discuss the social and cultural aspects of interreligious cooperation within the study sample, and 3) establish the relationship and compatibility between religious communities in the study sample, while also assessing the level of economic cooperation.
After analyzing the data, the researchers drew the following important conclusions: There is a strong level of trust among the different religious communities in Erbil province. These communities consider religious differences when addressing problems, life's secrets, and building social connections. Socially and culturally, the religious communities enjoy positive relationships. There is a spirit of mutual acceptance, and they respect each other's traditions, principles, rituals, and sacred items. This showcases a beautiful culture of mutual acceptance among the communities in Kurdistan. Additionally, there is good social harmony and economic cooperation between the religious communities.
Downloads
References
احمد، عباس شریف (2024)، پەيوەنديى پەروەردە بە پێكەوەژيان و نێوەندگيرى شوناسى كۆمەڵايەتى و شێوازى ژيان (توێژينەوەيەكى مەيدانييە لە شارى هەولێر)، تێزی دکتۆرا، بڵاو نەکراوە، پێشكەشى بەشى زانكۆى سەلاحەدين، كۆلێژى ئاداب.
شوانی، محمد (٢٠١٥)،، سەرەتایەک بۆ نوسینی توێژینەوە لە کۆمەڵناسیدا، چاپی یەکەم، هەولێر: چاپخانەی هێڤی.
میران، رەشاد (٢٠٠٠) رهوشی ئایینی و نهتهوهیی لهكوردستان، چ2، كوردستان – سهنتهری برایهتی.
ياساى ژمارە ٥ ى ساڵى ٢٠١٥.
اسلامى، سيد حسن (2000)، نگرش جامعەشناسى بە دين با تأكيد بر نظریه دورکهایم، پژوهش و حوزە، سال هفتم، شمارە بيست و ششم.
پور احمدى، حسين و كريمى الوار، كيوان (2006)، بررسى تطبيقى جامعەشناسى دين كارل ماركس و ماكس وبر با تاكيد بر جنبش بابك خرمدين، مطالعات تاريخ فرهنگى؛ پژوهشنامەى انجمن ايرانى تاريخ، سال هفتم، شمارە بيست وهشتم.
عبدالرضا، عليزاده و ديگران(٢٠١١ )، جامعهشناسي معرفت، قم: پژوهشگاه حوزه و دانشگاه.
گيدنز، آنتونى (2007)، جامعەشناسى، ترجمه حسين چاوشيان، تهران، نشر نى.
شهیب، عادل، ٢٠٢٣، التضامن الاجتماعي: مقاربة مفاهيمية، مجلە انثروبولوجیا، مجلد ٩، عدد ٠١.
cournil N, (2001) (Les Solidarites dumagius: Approcv anthropologique des forms d,entraide, In: GUILLAUME p. (sous la direction), Les Solidarites: Le lien dans tous sese tats, Maison des Sciences de I homme d,entraide, France.
Durkheim, E., 2023. The division of labour in society. In Social Theory Re-Wired (pp. 15-34). Routledge.
Giddens, Anthony and Duneier, Mithchell and Appelbaum, Richard (2005), Introduction to Sociology, Fifth Edition, New York, Norton. ISBN: 0-393-92553-6.
Himonga, C., Taylor, M. and Pope, A., 2013. Reflections on judicial views of ubuntu. Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, 16(5), pp.369-427.
James, William, 1902, The varieties of Religious Experience, New York, London, Green.
Mahmood, D. O. . and Anwar, B. H. . (2024) “The Relationship Between Frustration and Forms of Violence Among Young People: From the Perspective Frustration Theories "Albert Cohen" And ‘John Dollard’”, KOYA UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES, 7(2), pp. 58–72. doi: https://doi.org/10.14500/kujhss.v7n2y2024.pp58-72
Moxley, R.L., 1973. Social solidarity, ethnic rigidity, and differentiation in Latin American communities. Rural Sociology, 38(4), p.439.
Scott, M. Barbara and Schwartz, A. Mary (2000), Sociology, London, Allyn and Bacon.
Young, F., Spencer, B. and Flora, J., 1968. Differentiation and solidarity in agricultural communities. Human Organization, 27(4), pp.344-351.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Aryan S. Asaad , Zana A. Perdawd

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.