Variations in Intensifier Usage based on Gender in Kurdish EFL Learners' Spoken Language

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14500/kujhss.v8n1y2025.pp532-538

Keywords:

Intensifiers, Usage of Intensifiers, Gender Differences, Kurdish EFL Learners, Spoken Language

Abstract

The ways men and women utilize language have historically attracted much attention. To date, a lot of research has been done on the existence of contrasts between males and females. Hence, this study explores the intersection of gender and intensifier, examining the differential usage of intensifiers in the speech of Kurdish male and female university students at Koya University through using record interview “one-on-one interviews.” The method of this research is quantitative, for analyzing the collected data from the students’ recordings, the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences SPSS was used based on “The Shapiro-Wilk test.” To achieve the objectives of the study, interviewing forty-four 2nd grade students (males and females), two groups of students in the same proportion were interviewed: female university students between the ages of 19 and 21 years and male university students at an identical age between 19 and 21 years. Then 1020 sentences with amplifiers were retrieved and used as data. Results show that males and females use the booster amplifier “very” more than the other sorts but generally, women tend to use more intensifiers than males. There is a significant difference between males and females, because males and females have significantly different levels of use Too, Utterly, extremely as the findings showed that intensifiers like “too" and "extremely" were utilized by females more in their spoken language. In contrast males use "utterly" more statistically. These results offer insight into the intersection of language, gender, and power in modern society.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

aween T. sabir, Department of English Language, Faculty of Education, Koya University, Kurdistan Region, Iraq

Aween T.Sabir is a lecturer in the English department, Faculty of Education, she gained her BA degree in the Department of English/ College of Languages from Koya University in 2008-2009, and her MA degree( in Linguistics-pragmatics) in the department of English Language and Literature from Mansourah University/Egypt.

References

Ali, H. O. (2016). Gender differences in using language in the EFL Classes: from teachers’ views. International Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studied, 2(4), 73-91. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/34725614/Gender_Differences_in_Using_Language_in_the_EFL_Classes_From_Teachers_Views

Barnfield, K. and Buchstaller, I. (2010). “Intensifiers on Tyneside: Longitudinal Developments and New Trends.” English World-Wide 31(3): 252-287

Bernaisch, T. (2021). Gender in World Englishes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow, England: Longman.

Bolinger, D. (1972). Degree Words. The Hague and Paris: Mouton.

Claridge, C., Jonsson, E. & Kyto, M. (2024). Intensifiers in Late Modern English: A sociopragmatic Approach to Courtroom Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Coates, J. (1996). Women, Men and Language: A Sociolinguistic Account of Gender Differences in Language. Longman.

Eckert, Penelope. (2012). Three waves of variation study: The emergence of meaning in the study sociolinguistic variation. Annual Review of Anthropology 41, 78–100.Retrived from: https://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-092611-145828

Fattah, B. O. (2025). The role of gender in the use of Language in online interactions: Kurdish interlocutors as non- native English speakers. Humanities Journal of University of Zakho, 13(1), pp.42-53. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.26436/hjuoz.2025.13.1.1473

González-Estrada, E., & Cosmes, W. (2019). Shapiro–Wilk test for skew normal distributions based on data transformations. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 89(17), 3258-3272. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335450262_Shapiro-Wilk_test_for_skew_normal_distributions_based_on_data_transformations

Holmes, J. (1995). Women, Men and Politeness. Longman.

Ito, R., Tagliamonte, S., (2003). Well weird, right dodgy, very strange, really cool: layering and recycling in English intensifiers. Lang. Soc. 32 (2), 257–279.

König, E., Siegmund, P. & Töpper, S. (2013). Intensifiers and Reflexive Pronouns. (Available online at: https://www.academia.edu/26232055/Intensifiers_and_reflexive_pronouns

Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and Woman's Place. Harper & Row.

Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and women's place. New York: Harper and Row

Méndez-Naya, B. (2008). Special issue on English intensifiers. English Language and Linguistics, 12(2), 213-219.

Oyedepo, S. M. (1987). Lexical Difficulties in the Writ- ten English of Second Language Learners: A Study Conducted Among Secondary School Pupils in Nigeria. PhD Thesis, University of Wales.

Paradis, Carita. “Configurations, construals and change: Expressions of degree.” English Language and Linguistics 12.2 (2008): 317–343. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Web 10 May 2011. Available at https://lup.lub.lu.se/search/files/2826230/1590142.pdf

Partington, A. (1993). Corpus evidence of language change: the case of intensifiers. In M. Baker, G. Francis and E. Tognini-Bonelli (eds.), text and technology: in honour of John Sinclair (177-192). Amesterdam: John Benjamins.

Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. and, Svartvik., J. (1985). A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.

Rabiah, S. (2018). Language as a Tool for Communication and Cultural Reality Discloser [Preprint]. INA-Rxiv. https://doi.org/10.31227/osf.io/nw94m.

Ridha, N. (2012). The effect of EFL learners’ mother tongue on their writings in English. An error analy- sis study. Journal of the College of Arts, University of Basrah, 60, 22-45.

Riissanen,V. (2016). A comparative Corpus Study on Intensifiers in Singapore English [Master’s thesis, University of Tampere]. Available at: https://trepo.tuni.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/99226/GRADU-1465226222.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Romero, S. (2012). “This is so cool! – A Comparative Corpus Study on Intensifiers in British and American English. [Master’s thesis. Tampere: University of Tampere]. Available at: https://trepo.tuni.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/84065/gradu06287.pdf

Su, Y., (2016). corpus-based comparative study of intensifiers: Quiet, pretty, rather and fairly.” Journal of world languages, 3(3), 224-236. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316080551_Corpus-based_comparative_study_of_intensifiers_quite_pretty_rather_and_fairly

Tagliamonte, S. A., & Denis, D. (2008). Linguistic variation in social media: A study of gender differences in online interaction. Language Variation and Change, 20(3), 315–340.

Tannen, D. (1994). Talking from 9 to 5: Women and Men in the Workplace: Language, Sex, and Power. New York: William Morrow.

Xia, Xiufang. (2013). Gender differences in using language. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(8), 1485-1489. Available at: https://www.academypublication.com/issues/past/tpls/vol03/08/28.pdf

Published

2025-06-10

How to Cite

sabir, aween T. (2025) “Variations in Intensifier Usage based on Gender in Kurdish EFL Learners’ Spoken Language”, KOYA UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES, 8(1), pp. 532–538. doi: 10.14500/kujhss.v8n1y2025.pp532-538.