Civic Sense as Behavioral Infrastructure
Reflexive Governance and Public Responsibility in Decentralized India
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14500/kujhss.v8n2y2025.pp622-632Keywords:
Civic Responsibility, Local Governance, Institutional Trust, Public Participation, DecentralizationAbstract
The civic sense, conceived as a form of behavioral infrastructure, constitutes the foundational yet under-theorized pillar of democratic governance—particularly within the decentralized systems like those in India. Moving beyond its conventional framing as etiquette or social courtesy, the civic sense functions as a structural force shaping the institutional efficiency, public trust, and participatory accountability. This study interrogates the role of the civic ethos in local governance by drawing on comparative evidence from Dhaka (Bangladesh) and multiple districts in Kerala (India). It demonstrates that the civic indifference—expressed through disregard for public norms, low community engagement and rule evasion—undermines policy outcomes, and strains institutional capacity. In contrast, ethically informed public conduct, when cultivated through inclusive education, social modelling, and participatory spaces, reinforces governance responsiveness. Grounded in a reflexive governance framework, the study proposes an integrated model that connects citizenly practices with systemic performance, offering policy innovations such as civic audits, participatory dashboards, and embedded civic learning. Empirical findings highlight how variables such as age, gender, and institutional trust influence civic responsiveness, and affirm that democratic decentralization requires more than structural devolution—it demands a cultural infrastructure of responsibility and engagement. By positioning civic sense as a measurable, teachable, and policy-relevant dimension of governance, the paper contributes to contemporary debates in democratic theory, public administration, and civic renewal in postcolonial societies.
Downloads
References
Ansari, A. R. (2020). Local governance. Utkal University Distance Education Study Material.
Arendt, H. (1958). The human condition. University of Chicago Press.
Cardiff University. (2005). Civic education and local government: A literature review. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, UK.
Cowell, R., & Andrews, R. (2005). Civic education and local government: A literature review. Cardiff University. Retrieved from https://www.cardiff.ac.uk
Fung, A., & Wright, E. O. (2003). Deepening democracy: Institutional innovations in empowered participatory governance. Verso.
Gaventa, J., & Valderamma, C. (1999). Participation, citizenship and local governance. Institute of Development Studies. Retrieved from https://www.ids.ac.uk
Government of India. (2022). Swachh Survekshan toolkit. Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs.
Held, D. (2006). Models of democracy (3rd ed.). Stanford University Press.
Hossain, S. (2006). Social characteristics of a megacity: A case of Dhaka city, Bangladesh. University of Western Australia & Murdoch University.
Johnson, P. E. (n.d.). Quote on civic virtue and democracy. Retrieved from https://www.brainyquote.com
Kirk, H. D. (1964). Shared fate: A theory of adoption and mental health. Free Press of Glencoe.
Kymlicka, W., & Norman, W. (1994). Return of the citizen: A survey of recent work on citizenship theory.
Ethics, 104(2), 352–381. https://doi.org/10.1086/293605 Laski, H. J. (2004). A grammar of politics. Transaction Publishers.
Lister, R. (1998). Citizenship: Feminist perspectives. Macmillan.
Local_Governance.pdf. (2016). Retrieved from uploaded documents.
Local Governance.pdf. (2018). Participation and citizenship in local governance. Retrieved from uploaded documents.
Local Governance.pdf. (2020). Decentralized planning. Retrieved from uploaded documents.
Local Administration.pdf. (2019). Civic education and local government: A literature review. Retrieved from uploaded documents.
Lowndes, V., Pratchett, L., & Stoker, G. (2001). Trends in public participation: Part 2—Citizens’ perspectives. Public Administration, 79(2), 445–455. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9299.00264
Manor, J. (1999). The political economy of democratic decentralisation. World Bank.
Mookherjee, D. (2012). Accountability of local and state governments in India: An overview of recent research. Centre for Development Studies.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2020). Building trust to reinforce democracy. OECD Publishing.
Parekh, B. (1995). Gandhi's political philosophy: A critical examination. Palgrave Macmillan.
Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Harvard University Press.
Rajiv Gandhi National Institute of Youth Development (RGNIYD). (2019). M.A. Local governance and development curriculum document.
Ministry of Youth Affairs & Sports, Government of India. Sen, A. (2009). The idea of justice. Harvard University Press.
Tarannum, A. (2016). Sustainable city governance and civic sense among citizens. Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 4, 258–262.
United Cities and Local Governments (UCLG). (2020). Urban strategic planning: Key policy papers. Retrieved from https://www.uclg.org
United Cities and Local Governments. (2019). Global agenda for sustainable urban development. Retrieved from https://www.uclg.org
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2018). Civic engagement for good governance: Guidelines for practitioners. Retrieved from https://www.undp.org
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) India. (2021). Youth for change campaign reports. Retrieved from https://www.in.undp.org Wilson
R. H. (2000). Understanding local governance: An international perspective. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 40(2), 51–63.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Pratheesh Padath

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.



