Halliday’s Interpersonal Meta-function Analysis of Entrepreneur’s Public Speech in English and Central Kurdish A Comparative Study
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper examines the role and significance of Interpersonal language meta-function in understanding and constructing language use and functions among language users in a business context in English and Central-Kurdish languages. In analyzing entrepreneurs’ public speeches, the researchers employ the descriptive and qualitative approach with the content analysis. The instrument used in this study is to examine the qualitative exploratory data among entrepreneurs’ public speech in business discourse in English and Central-Kurdish. The paper attempts to answer the following questions; What is the dominant mood type among the entrepreneurs in English and Central-Kurdish in business discourse? How does the use and selection of the personal pronoun by entrepreneurs in English and Central-Kurdish influence the interpersonal meta-function? and lastly, What are the frequency and occurrence of Attitudinal mode in the public speech of entrepreneurs concerning Type and possible Polarity? The findings show the information about the distribution of the results in regard to the mood types, the use and selection of personal pronouns and the frequencies of each attitudinal mode in an entrepreneur’s public speech in English and Central Kurdish quantitatively. The study reveals that the prominent type of mood is declarative mood, besides the use and selection of the Personal Systems play a significant role in which the speaker expresses his attitude, influence and maintaining friendship and intimacy with the audience. The dominant personal pronoun is first personal system and the positive Affect mode exceeds other attitudinal modes both in English and Central-Kurdish.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Banks, D. (2019). A systemic functional grammar of English: a simple introduction. New York, Ny: Routledge.
Bargiela-Chiappini, F., Nickerson, C. and Planken, B. (2007). Business Discourse. London: Palgrave Macmillan: UK.
Halliday, M.A.K. (1970). ‘Functional Diversity in Language as Seen From a Consideration of Modality and Mood in English’.
Halliday, M.A.K. and C. Matthiessen. (2004). an Introduction to Functional Grammar: Third Edition. London: Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M.A.K. and M, C. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold ; New York.
Halliday, M.A.K. and M, C. (2014). Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar. 4th ed. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. in Literature and Language, 6(3), pp.79-83. Language, [online] 6(3), pp.322–361. Available at: https://philpapers.org/rec/
Halfedi Lucas, S. (2009). Student Workbook for the Art of Public Speaking. 10th ed. Boston: Mcgraw-Hill.
Martin, J.R. and P R R White (2005). The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Basingstoke ; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Pengsun, J.I.N. and Fengfeng, L.U., (2013). ‘A Contrastive Study of Political Speeches in Presidential Election of Interpersonal Meaning’. Studies.
Thompson, G. (2014). Introducing Functional Grammar. London: Routledge