The Status of Language in Howard Barker’s Theatrical World

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14500/kujhss.v8n1y2025.pp539-544

Keywords:

Language, Theatre, Poetic, Style, Character

Abstract

Howard Barker as postmodern British dramatist pays great attention to the freedom of expression and writing; he defies political and ideological censorship on British theater. Freedom of expression is well reflected in all his plays since the 1980s. He is well-known for his point of view that theater should not be used to deliver any moral, political, or ideological message, it should be left for the audience for interpretation. The composition and style of language are features of Barker’s plays that overflow with richness and diversity This paper discusses the theatrical language of Howard Barker and that his language of theater is poetic. Barker considers and explores language to be at the center of his theatrical profession and makes it better suit the new dramatic form in the British theater. In doing so, he makes language to express the complexity of modern man in a better way. He pays much attention to the style of his theatrical language and the words that come out of his character’s mouth. The ultimate goal of this paper is to show that Barker is deliberate and conscious in his use of the poetic language; he adopts a figurative language and other poetic devices. His language includes diversity of challenging ideas and provides no clarification and simplicity or deceptive of any message. His characters speak freely to the extent that social classes are not distinguished within the scope of his language of theater.  

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Pshtiwan M. Arf, Department of English Language, Faculty of Humanity and Social Sciences, Koya University, Kurdistan Region, Iraq

Pshtiwan Mira Arf is Assistance Lecturer at Koya University. He has BA in English Translation Studies, MA in English Literature. He is a member of the teaching staff and Manager of Koya University President's Office. His research interest include: Language, and Literature, especially modern English Literature.

References

Akdoğan, O. (2024) ‘Howard Barker in Gertrude-The Cry’, University Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences V. 16 N.1. pp 83-98.

Arf, P. and Abdulsalam, H. (2022) The Treatment of Violence in Howard Barker’s Judith, Koya University Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences (KUJHSS), Volume 5, Issue 1,Pp.45-40. https://doi.org/10.14500/kujhss.v5n1y2022.pp35-40

Barker, H. (1985) Power of the Dog, United Kingdom. P.17

Barker, H. (1993) Arguments for a Theatre, United Kingdom, Manchester, University Press, p. 81-82

Billington, JH. (2012), The state of reviewing today, edited by Maria M. Delgado and Caridad Svich, Theatre in Crisis? Performance manifestos for a new century, Manchester University Press, p. 56-57

Brown, M. (2013), Criticism and the Philosophy of the Art of Theatre, edited by David Ian Rabey and Sarah Goldingay in Howard Barker’s Art of Theatre: Essays on his plays, poetry and production work, Manchester: Manchester University Press. p. 96-97

Angel-Perez, E. (2007) An Interview with Howard Barker, University of Paris-Sorbonne.

Finburgh, C. (2008) Women in Howard Barker’s Theatre: Object or Subject?, OpenEdition Journals, Volume 35. Pp1-10.

Freeland, T. (2011) The End of Rhetoric and the Residuum of Pain:

Bodying Language in the Theatre of Howard Barker, University of Toronto Press, Volume 54. Pp. 78-98

Kershaw, B. (1999) ‘Discouraging Democracy: British Theatres and Economics, 1979-1999’, Theatre Journal, Volume. 51, N. 3. P. 267.

Khalvati, M. (2019) Carnivalisation of Catastrophe: A Study of Comedy in Howard Barker’s Theater of Catastrophe, PhD Thesis, University of South Africa. Pp.33-36

Imran, Y. (1989) A Study of the Plays of Howard Barker, with Special Reference to the Artist Figures, PhD thesis, University of Kent. Pp 95, 114-16

LAMB CH. (2005) THE THEATRE OF HOWARD BARKER, UNITED KINGDOM: LONDON.

Pp 23-24

Milling, J. (2012) Modern British Playwriting, Bloomsbury Publishing: United Kingdom. P. 32.

Midhin, M. (2015) An Interview with Howard Barker, United Kingdom:

Brighton.

Price, A. (1995) A Comparative Study of the Dramatic Writings of Wole Soyinka and Howard Barker. PhD Thesis, University of Leeds. Pp. 9-18

Rabey, I.D. and Gritzner, K. (2006) New Essays on Howard Barker, London: Oberon Books Ltd, Pp. 37-39

Rabey, I. D. (1989) Howard Barker: Politics and Desire: An Expository Study of His Drama and Poetry, 1969-87. London. pp.5, 42-44

Salman, N. T. (2018) The Freedom of Expression and the Dilemma of the Artist: A Thematic Study of Howard Barker’s Scenes from an Execution, University of Anbar. Pp10-12

Shaughnessy, R. (1989) ‘Howard Barker, the Wrestling School, and the Cult of the Author’, New Theatre Quarterly, Volume 5. Pp. 264 - 271.

Sumbul, Y. (2019) Howard Barker’s No End of Blame, DTCF Dergisi Journal, Volume 10. Pp.9-11.

Published

2025-06-10

How to Cite

Arf, P. M. (2025) “The Status of Language in Howard Barker’s Theatrical World”, KOYA UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES, 8(1), pp. 539–544. doi: 10.14500/kujhss.v8n1y2025.pp539-544.

Similar Articles

<< < 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.