Voicing a Nation
A Critical Discourse Analysis of Jalal Talabani’s Rhetoric on Kurdish Identity and Ethnic Oppression
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14500/kujhss.v9n2y2026.pp558-567Keywords:
Critical Discourse Analysis, Jalal Talabani, Kurdish Identity, Ethnic Oppression, legitimacyAbstract
This paper examines the rhetoric of the late Jalal Talabani to answer to what extent he constructed the Kurdish identity and provided a clear illustration of the ongoing ethnic discrimination and subjugation of Kurds. Despite Talabani's pivotal place in Kurdish political history, very few scholars have utilized his earlier discourse to identify and analyse structures of ethnic discrimination and collective suffering. This study fills that gap by addressing the language role as a tool of national identity assertion through an analysis of Talabani’s speeches. This is qualitative research with Critical Discourse Analysis based on van Dijk's socio-cognitive model, which considers discourse at three levels: textual, cognitive and social. The strategy facilitates investigation of linguistic devices such as lexical choice, repetition, and passivation at the textual level; intertextuality, polarization, and implicit at the cognitive level; and power relations, ethnic and social inequality, legitimacy and representation, and victimhood or heroism at the social level. These markers can help to reveal the way Talabani’s discourse creates and reinforces Kurdish identity in an environment of ethnic oppression. It concludes that Talabani's associated rhetoric works as a strategic discursive force to raise the Kurdish struggle from the political resistance to an identity formation act. Talabani uses intentional language and socio-cognitive framing to aggregate pain into a story of common suffering and collective resistance. Utilizing emotionally charged data and historical allusions, he reframes Kurdish identity not simply as a product of past victimization but rather as a method to future empowerment through rhetorical polarization itself.
Downloads
References
Ahmad, S. (2018). Language, power, and resistance: A critical discourse study of Kurdish autonomy claims in Syria. Damascus, Syria: Damascus Research Institute.
Ahmed, A. H., & Faiq, A. M. (2023). A socio-cognitive approach to the analysis of selected American (athletes) celebrity speeches. Koya University Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 6(1), 32–49. https://doi.org/10.14500/kujhss.v6n1y2023.pp32-49
Asiiir. (2011, January 23). Jalal Talabani - answers a Turkish student for why he uses word “Kurdistan” [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZDwzytsUqFE
Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. London, England: Routledge.
Gunter, M. M. (1993). The Kurds of Iraq: Tragedy and hope. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.
Hall, S. (1996). Introduction: Who needs “identity”? In S. Hall & P. du Gay (Eds.), Questions of cultural identity (pp. 1–17). London, England: SAGE.
Human Rights Watch. (1993). Genocide in Iraq: The Anfal campaign against the Kurds. New York, NY: Human Rights Watch.
Jenkins, R. (2008). Social identity (3rd ed.). London, England: Routledge.
Kristeva, J. (1980). Desire in language: A semiotic approach to literature and art. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
McDowall, D. (2004). A modern history of the Kurds (3rd ed.). London, England: I.B. Tauris.
Rezaei, M. (2020). Constructing ethnic identity through political discourse: The case of Kurdish leaders in Iran. Tehran, Iran: University of Tehran Press.
Romano, D. (2006). The Kurdish nationalist movement: Opportunity, mobilization and identity. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Salih, A. (2012, April 16). Gali Kurdistan1. ههفال مام جلال -1988 [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DMdUrIkxFTc
Salih, A. (2015). Kurdish political discourse in Iraq: From marginalization to power. Sulaymaniyah, Iraq: University of Sulaymaniyah Press.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. London, England: SAGE.
van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Discourse and manipulation. Discourse & Society, 17(3), 359–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926506060250
van Dijk, T. A. (2008). Discourse and power. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
Wodak, R. (2015). The politics of fear: What right-wing populist discourses mean. London, England: SAGE.
Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2016). Methods of critical discourse studies. London, England: SAGE.
Wodak, R., & Reisigl, M. (2001). Discourse and discrimination: Rhetorics of racism and antisemitism. London, England: Routledge.
Yıldırım, H. (2012). Discursive representations of Kurdish national identity in Turkish media. Ankara, Turkey: Ankara University Press.
Yildiz, K. (2005). The Kurds in Iraq: The past, present and future. London, England: Pluto Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Asmaa Kh. Azeez

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.



