Main Article Content
This article focuses on the politics of U.S. intervention against the Islamic State. In the last two decades after the 9\11, the U.S. intervened in many countries in different ways. For example, the U.S. forces and its allies fully intervened in Afghanistan in 2001 and in Iraq in 2003. After the dynamic changes in the Middle East and the era of Arab spring the intervention has changed in different way. Especially when the terrorist organizations rose the U.S. has repeated the same way used in the Kosovo war (1999) against the Islamic State, which has not fully intervened. U.S. public opinion plays a great role in U.S. politics. Regional and international relations between countries are crucial. It will be worth addressing Turkey, Iran, and Kurdish forces in regional considerations because all of them have a border with the Islamic State. Besides, the IS directly and indirectly, has impacted on them. In international considerations, the U.S. usually makes a coalition and alliance to intervene in countries and groups. The purpose of the study is to understand the politics of U.S. intervention against the Islamic State. This article examines it from three perspectives: firstly, a change in the U.S. policy of intervention; secondly, the U.S. domestic political considerations; thirdly, Regional and International considerations. Following this evaluation, this study answering the question: Why has the U.S. not fully intervened against the Islamic State? This research concludes that the U.S. should change its policy of intervention from one time to another. The U.S. should change its military tactics from one war to another war. The American government should understand how its domestic politics and other countries feel about the politics of U.S. intervention against I.S. ultimately; it appears that the politics of U.S. intervention are complex. However, there is still a way to understand it.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Ben Connable, James Dobbins, Howard J. Shatz, Raphael S. Cohen, Becca Wasser, Weighing U.S. Troop Withdrawal from Iraq, RAND corporation, 2020, AVAILABLE AT: Weighing U.S. Troop Withdrawal from Iraq: Strategic Risks and Recommendations | RAND
Codner, M. (2014) ‘The Two Towers, 2001-13’, Johnson, A. (eds.) ‘Wars In Peace British Military Operations since 1991’. London: Royal United Services Institute for Defence and Security Studies (RUSI), pp. 49-87.
Eichenberg, R. (2005) ‘Victory Has Many Friends: U.S. Public Opinion and the Use of Military Forde, 1981-2005’, International Security, 30(1), pp. 140-177.
Esfandiary, D. and Tabatabai, A. (2015) ‘Iran’s ISIS policy,’ International Affairs, 91(1), pp. 1-15.
Jentleson, B. and Britton, R. (1998) ‘Still Pretty Prudent: Post-Cold War American Public Opinion on the Use of Military Force,’ The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 42(4), pp. 395-417.
Keohane, D. (2000) ‘The debate on British policy in the Kosovo conflict: An assessment,’ Contemporary Security Policy, 21(3), pp. 78-94.
Keohane, D. (2005) ‘The United Kingdom,’ in Danchev, A. and MacMillan, J. (eds.) The Iraq War and Democratic Politics. New York: Routledge, pp. 59-76.
Kurth, J. (2005) ‘The Iraq War and Humanitarian Intervention,’ Global Dialogue, 7(1/2), pp. 97.
Lauria, J., and Levinson, C. (2012) ‘Russia, China Veto U.N. Resolution on Syria,’ Dow Jones & Company Inc, New York, N.Y., 04 February 2012, pp. n/a.
MacMillan, J. (2013) ‘Intervention and the ordering of the modern world,’ Review of International Studies, 39(5), pp. 1039-1056.
Mint (2014) ‘U.S. warplanes strike Islamic State artillery in Iraq’, H.T. Media Ltd, New Delhi, 09 August 2014.
Phillips, D. (2014) ‘ISIS Crisis,’ American Foreign Policy Interests, 36(6), pp. 351-360.
Samuel P. Huntington, Who are we? the challenges to American national identity, Simon and Schuster, Newyork, 2004.
Schultz, K. (1998) ‘Domestic Opposition and Signaling in International Crises,’ The American Political Science Review, 92(4), pp. 829-844.
Smith, R. (2006) ‘Introduction: Understanding Force’ in The utility of force: the art of war in the modern world. London: Penguin, pp. 1-26.
Sprusansky, D. (2014) ‘Understanding ISIS: frequently asked questions. (Special Report)’, Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, 33(7), pp. 19.
The Financial Express (2014) ‘President Obama faces ISIS,’ H.T. Media Ltd, Dhaka, 14 September 2014.
The White House (2014) ‘Statement by the President on Iraq’. Retrieved from The White House Office of the Press Secretary. Available at: http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2014/08/09/statement-president-iraq (Accessed: 20 February 2015).
U.S. Department of State (2014) ‘Joint Statement Issued by Partners at the Counter-ISIL Coalition Ministerial Meeting.’ Retrieved from U.S. Department of State (Office of the Spokesperson). Available at: http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2014/12/234627.htm (Accessed: 03 December 2014).