الخطاب و هيكل الفكر معرفي

الشريط الجانبي للمقالة

View The PDF File (English)
منشور: فبر 18, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14500/kujhss.v5n1y2022.pp147-158

محتوى المقالة الرئيسي

Arazoo R. Othamn
Department of English Language, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Koya University, Kurdistan Region, Iraq
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1638-5131
Salah M. Salih
Department of English Language, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Koya University, Kurdistan Region, Iraq
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3966-8019

الملخص

الخطاب و هيكل الفكر 

التنزيلات

بيانات التنزيل غير متوفرة بعد.

تفاصيل المقالة

كيفية الاقتباس
Othamn, A. R. و Salih, S. M. (2023) "الخطاب و هيكل الفكر : معرفي", مجلة جامعة كويه للعلوم الإنسانية والاجتماعية, 5(1), ص 147-158. doi: 10.14500/kujhss.v5n1y2022.pp147-158.
إصدار
مجلد 5 عدد 1 (2022): Issue Eighth
القسم
Articles
Creative Commons License

هذا العمل مرخص بموجب Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

السير الشخصية للمؤلفين

Arazoo R. Othamn، Department of English Language, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Koya University, Kurdistan Region, Iraq

Arazoo Rashid Othman is a lecturer and a member of the teaching faculty at the Department of English Language, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Koya University, Kurdistan Region, Iraq. In 2002, I achieved my BA degree as one of the top students at Salahaddin University. Since then, I have been employed at Koya University as an assistant researcher. In 2006, I achieved my MA degree at Koya University. I am interested in different disciplines such as Discourse Analysis, Cognitive linguistics, Syntax and Semantics. 

 

 

Salah M. Salih، Department of English Language, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Koya University, Kurdistan Region, Iraq

Salah M. Salih is an assistant professor of Linguistics & English Language at the Department of English Language & Translation at Koya University. He gained his BA in English Language & Literature from Al-Anbar University in 1995; MA and Ph.D. in Linguistics and English Language from Baghdad University in 2000 and 2003 respectively. He started his academic teaching in 1995 when he worked as the Lab Assistant at Al-Anbar University. In 1996, he joined the Department of English, College of Arts, Baghdad University to pursue his MA and Ph.D. study and teach there as well, he worked as a lecturer in the Department of English Language in both the College of Arts and the College of Languages, Baghdad University during the academic years 1997-2003. In 2003-2005, he worked as an Asst. Prof. and the Head of the Department of English Language at the College of Education, Seyoun, Hadhramout University for Science and Technology, Republic of Yemen. 

 

المراجع

Al-Rawi, M.K.S., 2017. The validity of CDA as a means of “uncovering” the ideologies implicit in discourse. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 22(03), pp.48-53.

Dijk, T.A., 1995. Discourse analysis as ideology analysis. C. Schäffner, & A. Wenden (Eds.), Language and Pace (s. 17-33).

Dijk, T.V., 2000. Ideology and discourse: A multidisciplinary introduction. Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona.

Eagleton, T., 2014. Ideology. Routledge.

Fattah, B. O. and Salih, S. M. (2022) “Colloquialism and the Community of Practice”, Koya University Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 5(1), pp. 77-84. doi: 10.14500/kujhss.v5n1y2022.pp77-84.

Glaser, E., 2014. If ideology is dead, how can the new politics find its voice?. NEF Working Paper, pp.4-17.

Haj Omar, H., 2016. Ideology, media and conflict in political discourse and its translation.

Hodge, B., 2012. Ideology, Identity, Interaction: Contradictions and Challenges for Critical Discourse Analysis. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines, 5(2). ideology... British Journal of Sociology, pp.473-499.

Jørgensen, M.W. and Phillips, L.J., 2002. Discourse analysis as theory and method. Sage.Bhatia, Vijay K, John

Koller, V., 2005. Critical discourse analysis and social cognition: evidence from business media discourse. Discourse & Society, 16(2), pp.199-224.

Määttä, S.K., 2014. Discourse and Ideology—Why Do We Need Both?. In Spanish and Portuguese across Time, Place, and Borders (pp. 63-77). Palgrave Macmillan, London.

Menard, R., 2017. Critical discourse studies on social values, ideology and Finnish equality.

Mills, Sara (1997) Discourse. Londodn and Newyork: Routledge.

Othman, S. M. and Salih, S. M. (2021) “Dimensions of Implication: A Review of the Saying-Meaning-Implying Trichotomy”, Koya University Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(1), pp. 151-162. doi: 10.14500/kujhss.v4n1y2021.pp151-162.

Persson, E. and Neto, L.M., 2018. Ideology and discourse in the public sphere: A critical discourse analysis of public debates at a Brazilian public university. Discourse & Communication, 12(3), pp.278-306.

Pihlaja, S. and Musolff, A., 2017. 14. Discourse and ideology. Pragmatics of social media, 11, p.381.

Purvis, T. and Hunt, A., 1993. Discourse, ideology, discourse, ideology, discourse,

Rasoul, S. H. and Kareem, O. M. (2019) “Synta-Pragmatics of The Conjunctions in Kurdish Language”, Koya University Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(2), pp. 1-8. doi: 10.14500/kujhss.v2n2y2019.pp1-8.

Renkema, J. ed., 2009. Discourse, of course: An overview of research in discourse studies.

Salih, S. M. (2020) “Textual Presupposition: An Intertextual Account”, Koya University Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(1), pp. 1-7. doi: 10.14500/kujhss.v3n1y2020.pp1-7.

van Dijk Teun, A., 2003. Political Discourse and Ideology/Teun A van Dijk. Anàlisi del discurs polític.–Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra, IULA, pp.15-34.

Van Dijk, T. A., 1992. Discourse and cognition in Society. University of Amsterdam, program of Discourse studies.

Van Dijk, T., 2003. Discourse, ideology and context. Mediator: Jurnal Komunikasi, 4(2), pp.325-346.

Van Dijk, T.A., 1995. Discourse semantics and ideology. Discourse & society, 6(2), pp.243-289.

Van Dijk, T.A., 1995. Ideological discourse analysis. In In.

Van Dijk, T.A., 1995. On macrostructures, mental models, and other inventions: A brief personal history of the Kintsch-van

Dijk theory. Discourse comprehension: Essays in honor of Walter Kintsch, pp.383-410.

Van Dijk, T.A., 1998. Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. Sage.

Van Dijk, T.A., 2001. Discourse, ideology and context.

Van Dijk, T.A., 2002. Political discourse and political cognition. Politics as text and talk: Analytic approaches to political discourse, 203, pp.203-237.

Van Dijk, T.A., 2003. Political discourse and ideology.

Van Dijk, T.A., 2005. Discourse analysis as ideology analysis. In Language & peace (pp. 41-58). Routledge.

Van Dijk, T.A., 2006. Ideology and discourse analysis. Journal of political ideologies, 11(2), pp.115-140.

Van Dijk, T.A., 2006. Politics, ideology, and discourse.

Van Dijk, T.A., 2009. Society and discourse: How social contexts influence text and talk. Cambridge University Press.

Van Dijk, T.A., 2011. Discourse and ideology. Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction, pp.379-407.

Van Dijk, T.A., 2016. Discourse and racism: Some conclusions of 30 years of research. Interdisciplinary studies in pragmatics, culture and society, pp.285-295.

Verschueren, J., 2012. Ideology in language use: Pragmatic guidelines for empirical research. Cambridge University Press