ڕوپێوی ئۆنلاین وه‌كو ئامرازێكی كۆكردنه‌وه‌ی زانیاری -توێژینه‌وه‌یه‌كی تیۆرییه-
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
پوختە
له‌م چه‌ند ده‌یه‌ی كۆتاییدا، ڕوپێوی ئۆنلاین وه‌كو ته‌كنیكێكی نوێی كۆكردنه‌وه‌ی داتا و زانیارییهكان له ڕاپرسیه بازرگانی و سیاسیه‌كان هه‌روها له توێژینه‌وه زانستی و ئه‌كادیمیه‌كاندا به شێوه‌یه‌كی بڵاو ده‌ركه‌وت؛ په‌ره‌سه‌ندنی خێرای ئه‌م ته‌كنیكه له‌لایه‌كه‌وه په‌یوه‌ندی بە زیادبونی به‌كارهێنانی ئینته‌رنێت، كۆمپیته‌ر و مۆبایلی زیره‌كه‌وه هه‌یه. به پێی توێژینه‌وه‌كان، له ساڵی 2023، زیاتر 65% دانیشتوانی جیهان به‌كارهێنه‌ری ئینته‌رنێتـن و زیاتر له 85% دانیشتوانی جیهان مۆبایلی زیره‌ك به‌كارده‌هێنن؛ له‌لایه‌كی دیكه‌وه، ئه‌م په‌ره‌سه‌ندنه په‌یوه‌ندی به پێویستیی توێژه‌ران به دروستبونی ته‌كنیكی نوێی كۆكردنه‌وه‌ی زانیاریيه‌كانەوە، بۆ شیكردنه‌وه‌ی ئه‌و دیاردانه‌ی كه په‌یوه‌نديیان به دونیای کۆمەڵایەتی ئێستاوه هه‌یه. ئامانجی ئه‌م توێژینه‌وه‌یه، دروستكردنی ژێرخانێكی تیۆرییه بۆ ئه‌وه‌ی بتوانرێ له‌سه‌ر ئاستی كرداری له توێژینه‌وه ئه‌كادیميه‌كاندا سود له ڕوپێوی ئۆنلاین وه‌ربگیرێت. ئه‌م توێژینه‌وه‌یه توێژینه‌وه‌یه‌كی وه‌سفییه. گرنگترین ئەنجامه‌كانی ئه‌م توێژینه‌وه‌یه بریتین له: ڕوپێوی ئۆنلاین وه‌كو ته‌كنیكێكی كاریگه‌ر ده‌توانێت ئاسانكاری بۆ توێژه‌ران بكات بۆ ئه‌وه‌ی به تێچو و كاتێكی كه‌متر، زانیارییهكان كۆبكه‌نه‌وه. به‌ڵام به هۆی ئه‌و كێشه میتۆدیانه‌ی كه ڕوبه‌ڕوی ڕوپێوی ئۆنلاین ده‌بنه‌وه، ئه‌وا ناتوانرێ دڵنیایی ئاستێكی به‌رزی كوالیتی داتاكان بدرێت به تایبه‌تی له ڕوی جێگیری (Reliability) و ڕاستیه‌تی (Validity)یەوە. بۆیه پێوسته توێژه‌ران سود له ته‌كنیكی تێكه‌ڵاو وه‌ربگرن، كه هه‌ردوك ڕوپێوی ڕوبەڕو و ئۆنلاین له توێژینه‌وه‌یه‌كدا كۆده‌كاته‌وه .
##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
سەرچاوەکان
Baker, R., Battaglia, M., Couper, M. P., Dever, J. A., Gile, K. J., Tourangeau, R., Boruch, R., Callegaro, M., Fan, D. P., Piekarski, L., Werner, J., & Werner Data Processing Clifford Young, J. (2013). REPORT OF THE AAPOR TASK FORCE ON NON-PROBABILITY SAMPLING.
Bethlehem, J. (2010). Selection Bias in Web Surveys. International Statistical Review, 78(2), 161–188. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-5823.2010.00112.x
Bethlehem, J. (2016). Solving the Nonresponse Problem with Sample Matching? Social Science Computer Review, 34(1), 59–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439315573926
Bhutta, C. B. (2012). Not by the Book: Facebook as a Sampling Frame. Sociological Methods and Research, 40(1), 57–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124112440795
Biemer, P. P., Leeuw, E. D. de, Eckman, S., Edwards, B., Kreuter, F., Lyberg, L., Tucker, C., & West, B. T. (2017). Total survey error in practice.
Blom, A. G., Bosnjak, M., Cornilleau, A., Cousteaux, A. S., Das, M., Douhou, S., & Krieger, U. (2016). A Comparison of Four Probability-Based Online and Mixed-Mode Panels in Europe. Social Science Computer Review, 34(1), 8–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439315574825
Braun, V., Clarke, V., Boulton, E., Davey, L., & McEvoy, C. (2021). The online survey as a qualitative research tool. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 24(6), 641–654. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2020.1805550
Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods. Oxford University Press.
Callegaro, M., Baker, R. P., Bethlehem, J., Göritz, A. S., Krosnick, J. A., & Lavrakas, P. J. (Eds.). (2014). Online panel research: A data quality perspective. John Wiley & Sons.
Callegaro, M., Villar, A., Yeager, D., & Krosnick, J. A. (2014). A critical review of studies investigating the quality of data obtained with online panels based on probability and nonprobability samples1. In Online Panel Research: A Data Quality Perspective (Vol. 9781119941774, pp. 23–53). Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118763520.ch2
Callegaro, M., Manfreda, K. L., & Vehovar, V. (2015). Web survey methodology. Sage.
Chang, L., & Krosnick, J. A. (2009). National surveys via RDD telephone interviewing versus the internet: Comparing sample representativeness and response quality. In Public Opinion Quarterly (Vol. 73, Issue 4, pp. 641–678). https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfp075
Cooper, C. J., Cooper, S. P., Del Junco, D. J., Shipp, E. M., Whitworth, R., & Cooper, S. R. (2006). Web-based data collection: Detailed methods of a questionnaire and data gathering tool. Epidemiologic Perspectives and Innovations, 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-5573-3-1
Couper, M. P. (2000). Web Surveys A Review Of Issues And Approaches. In Public Opinion Quarterly (Vol. 64). Http://Www.Websm.Org.
Couper, M. P. (2007). Issues of Representation in eHealth Research (with a Focus on Web Surveys). American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 32(5 SUPPL.). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2007.01.017
Couper, M. P. (2017). New Developments in Survey Data Collection. Annual Review of Sociology, 43(1), 121–145. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-060116-053613
Couper, M. P., & Miller, P. V. (2008). Web survey methods: Introduction. In Public Opinion Quarterly (Vol. 72, Issue 5, pp. 831–835). https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfn066
de Leeuw, E. D. (2012). Counting and Measuring Online: The Quality of Internet Surveys*. In BMS Bulletin of Sociological Methodology/ Bulletin de Methodologie Sociologique (Vol. 114, Issue 1, pp. 68–78). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1177/0759106312437290
Dever, J. A., Rafferty, A., & Valliant, R. (2008). Internet Surveys: Can Statistical Adjustments Eliminate Coverage Bias? In Survey Research Methods (Vol. 2, Issue 2). http://www.surveymethods.org
Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method. John Wiley & Sons.
Duffy, M. E. (2002). Methodological issues in web‐based research. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 34(1), 83-88.
Fielding, N. G., Lee, R. M., & Blank, G. (2017). The Sage handbook of online research methods.
Fricker, R. D. (2016). Sampling methods for online surveys. The SAGE handbook of online research methods, 162-183.
Fricker, R. D., & Schonlau RAND, M. (2002). Advantages and Disadvantages of Internet Research Surveys: Evidence from the Literature. www.websm.org.
Frippiat, D., Marquis, N., & Wiles, E. (2010). Web Surveys in the Social sciences: An Overview (Vol. 65, Issue 2). http://www.jstor.orgURL:http://www.jstor.org/stable/40960969
Grandcolas, U., Rettie, R., & Marusenko, K. (2003). Web survey bias: sample or mode effect?. Journal of Marketing Management, 19(5-6), 541-561.
Granello, D. H., & Wheaton, J. E. (2004). Online data collection: Strategies for research. Journal of Counseling and Development, 82(4), 387–393. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6678.2004.tb00325.
Joinson, A. N., Paine, C., Buchanan, T., & Reips, U. D. (2008). Measuring self-disclosure online: Blurring and non-response to sensitive items in web-based surveys. Computers in Human Behavior,24(5),2158–2171 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.10.005
Khan, M. M., & Musa Khan, M. D. (2023). Personal View Project Web Panel Surveys-A Challenge For Official Statistics In Bangladesh. Https://Doi.Org/10.17605/Osf.Io/9pwrv
Kumar Ranjit. (2011). Research Methodology. www.sagepublications.com
Lee, S. (2006). An evaluation of nonresponse and coverage errors in a prerecruited probability web panel survey. In Social Science Computer Review (Vol. 24, Issue 4, pp. 460–475). https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439306288085
Lehdonvirta, V., Oksanen, A., Räsänen, P., & Blank, G. (2021). Social Media, Web, and Panel Surveys: Using Non-Probability Samples in Social and Policy Research. Policy and Internet, 13(1), 134–155. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.238
Loosveldt, G., & Sonck, N. (2008, June). An evaluation of the weighting procedures for an online access panel survey. In Survey Research Methods (Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 93-105).
Manfreda, K. L., Berzelak, J., Vehovar, V., & Bosnjak, M. (2008). Web surveys versus other survey modes: a meta-analysis comparing response rates. In International Journal of Market Research (Vol. 50, Issue 1).
Neuman, W. L. (2013). Social research methods: qualitative and quantitative approaches, Pearson Education
Peytchev, A. (2013). Consequences of Survey Nonresponse. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 645(1), 88–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716212461748
Rivers, D. (2007, August). Sampling for web surveys. In Joint Statistical Meetings (Vol. 4). Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.
Sills, S. J., & Song, C. (2002). Innovations in Survey Research An Application of Web-Based Surveys. In SOCIAL SCIENCE COMPUTER REVIEW Sills.
Silvia Biffignandi and Jelke Bethlehem. (2021). Handbook of Web Surveys, Second Edition.
Siva, M., Nayak, D. P., & Narayan, K. A. (2019). Strengths and Weakness of Online Surveys. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences (IOSR-JHSS, 24(5). https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-2405053138
Skarupova, K. (2014). Computer-assisted and online data collection in general population surveys.
Spencer, N. H., Syrdal, D. S., Coates, M., & Huws, U. (2022). Assessing bias in online surveys using alternative survey modes. 16(1), 34–51. https://doi.org/10.2307/48675868
Topp, N. W., & Pawloski, B. (2002). Online Data Collection. In Journal of Science Education and Technology (Vol. 11, Issue 2). www.snapshotsurvey.org;
Van Selm, M., & Jankowski, N. W. (2006). Conducting online surveys. In Quality and Quantity (Vol. 40, Issue 3, pp. 435–456). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-005-8081-8
Wejnert, C., & Heckathorn, D. D. (2008). Web-based network sampling: Efficiency and efficacy of respondent-driven sampling for online research. Sociological Methods and Research, 37(1), 105–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124108318333
Bankmycell (2023), how many smartphones are in the world? (Source: https://www.bankmycell.com/blog/how-many-phones-are-in-the-world)
Statista (2023) ،Number of internet and social media users worldwide as of October, https://www.statista.com/statistics