Investigating Badini Kurdish Speaker’s Awareness Towards Clarifying the Intended Meaning of Homonyms
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14500/kujhss.v8n1y2025.pp478-485Keywords:
Badini Kurdish, Homonyms, Intended Meaning, Lexical Ambiguity, Speakers’ AwarenessAbstract
The study investigates the role of homonyms that causes lexical ambiguity, highlighting speaker’s awareness and difficulties in conveying intended meaning during communication. In this research, by using a qualitative method; the data have been collected from the students’ awareness of their Badini Kurdish via a test that includes thirty questions. On this basis, 100 EFL learners have been chosen from Nawroz University, translation department. The data were interpreted and analyzed via t-test. The results display that students fail to recognize the correct homonyms from their native language that is 59% incorrect versus 41% correct homonyms. As far as parts of speech included results show that on the basis of correct and incorrect measurement, prepositions section (82%) compared to the lowest correct answers in the verb section (43%). Also, the relative percentage of the correct answers exceeded 50% for both noun and adverb sections. The outcomes of this study display that students are (1) mostly weak in being aware of homonyms; (2) a lack of a standardized system of the Kurdish language; (3) difficulty of translation and writing in the mother tongue and the foreign language;(4) confusion of recognizing parts of speech in the language structure of both Kurdish and English. Typically, being aware of homonyms helps students to be precise in translation and assists them to distinguish between different word meanings. It also supports them to infer in contextual meanings and conducting critical text analysis for deeper or layered messages
Downloads
References
Abdul Ameer, A.M.A. and Altaie, A.A.J. (2010) Homonymy in English and Arabic: A Contrastive Study. [Master's thesis] Babylon University, College of Education.
Ahmed, M. A. (2010). The legal status of the Kurds in the Middle East: The twenty-first century policies of Turkey, Iran, Syria and Iraq towards the Kurds. University of Exeter (United Kingdom).
Badawi, S. (2023) 'Some Aspects of Ambiguity Between Kurdish and English: A Contrastive Study', Culingua: Journal of Cultura and Lingua, 4(1).
Bianchi, C. (2006) 'Nobody loves me: quantification in context', Philosophical Studies, 130(2), pp. 377–397.
Booth, J.R., Harasaki, Y. and Burman, D.D. (2006) 'Development of lexical and sentence-level context effects for dominant and subordinate word meanings of homonyms', J Psycholinguist Res, 35, pp. 531–554. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-006-9028-5 (Accessed: 8 December 2024).
Conwell, E. (2017) 'Are Homophones Acoustically Distinguished in Child-Directed Speech?', Language Learning and Development, 13(3), pp. 262–281. DOI: 10.1080/15475441.2016.1277652.
Cruciani, M. (2010) 'On the notion of intended meaning', ResearchGate, 1028. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228912774_On_the_Notion_of_Intended_Meaning (Accessed: 5 December 2024).
Crystal, D. (2003) A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. 5th edn. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
Croft, W. (2000). Parts of speech as language universals and as language-particular categories. Empirical approaches to language typology, 65-102.
Granger, S., & Paquot, M. (2009). Lexical verbs in academic discourse: A corpus-driven study of learner use. Academic writing: At the interface of corpus and discourse, 193-214.
Doherty, M.J. (2000) 'Children’s understanding of homonymy: metalinguistic awareness and false belief', Journal of Child Language, 27(2), pp. 367–392. DOI: 10.1017/S0305000900004153.
Eragamreddy, N. Examining How Semantics Influences Communication in the Classroom.
Faqe-Abdulla, B. I. (2023). Investigating the frequency of deictic expressions in academic papers. Koya University Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 6(1), 223–234. https://doi.org/10.14500/kujhss.v6n1y2023.pp223-234.
Farghal, M. (1998) Vocabulary Development and Lexical Relations: A Coursebook. Irbid: Dar Al-Hilal.
Freire, P. (2013) Education for critical consciousness. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Grice, P. (1957) 'Meaning', Philosophical Review, 66, pp. 377–88.
Kroeger, P.R. (2018) Analyzing meaning: An introduction to semantics and pragmatics. Berlin: Language Science Press.
Leech, G.N. (1981) Semantics: The Study of Meaning. 2nd edn. London: Penguin Books.
Mamedova, M. (2019) 'Classification of homonyms of the English language', European Journal of Research and Reflection in Educational Sciences, 7(12). ISSN 2056-5852.
Mamedova, M. (2020) 'Classification of homonyms of the English language', ID Publications. Available at: https://www.idpublications.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Full-Paper-CLASSIFICATION-OF-HOMONYMS-OF-THE-ENGLISH-LANGUAGE.pdf (Accessed: 8 December 2024).
Mehta, B., Bhandari, B., Sharma, P., & Kaur, R. (2016). Short answer open-ended versus multiple-choice questions: A comparison of objectivity. Annals of the National Academy of Medical Sciences (India), 52(3), 173–182. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1712619
Rabadi, R.I. (2015) 'Homonymy and its effect on students of translation at Jordanian Universities', Arab World English Journal, 6(4), pp. 26–38.
Raga, A. and Adola, S. (2012) 'Homonymy as a barrier to mutual intelligibility among speakers of various dialects of Afan Oromo', Journal of Language and Culture, 3(2), pp. 32–43. DOI: 10.5897/JLC11.085.
Riemer, N. (2010) Introducing Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rodd, J.M., Gaskell, M.G. and Marslen-Wilson, W.D. (2002) 'Making sense of semantic ambiguity: Semantic competition in lexical access', Journal of Memory and Language, 46, pp. 245–266.
Rodd, J.M., Gaskell, M.G. and Marslen-Wilson, W.D. (2002) 'Making sense of semantic ambiguity: Semantic competition in lexical access', Journal of Memory and Language, 46, pp. 245–266.
Saeed, K.A. and Muhemddin, R.N. (2011) Investigating Kurd EFL Learners’ Ability in Mastering Homonymy. [Master’s thesis] University of Sulaimani. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309386334 (Accessed: 2 December 2024).
Sheyholislami, J. (2015) 'Language varieties of the Kurds', in Taucher, W., Vogl, M. and Webinger, P. (eds.) The Kurds: History, religion, language, politics. Vienna: Austrian Federal Ministry of the Interior, pp. 30–51.
Sherzad, R., & Toma, S. S. (2024). Investigating passive voice problems in Kurdish students’ translation from and into English. Academic Journal of Nawroz University, 13(1), 562-580.
Tulloch, A. (2017) Understanding English Homonyms: Their Origins and Usage. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
Tolliboyeva, G., & Shakarova, S. (2024, May). The Role Of Grammar In The Enlargement Of The English Vocabulary. In Conference Proceedings: Fostering Your Research Spirit (pp. 827-831).
محەمەدی مەحوی، زانستی هێما و واتا لێکدانەوە، زانکوی سلێمانی،٢٠٠٩
شێرزاد سەبری عەلی. محمد عبدللە ئامێدی (٢٠١٧) فەرهەنگا پەیڤێن هەڤبێژ دزمانێ کوردیدا. هەولێر: کتێبخانا جزیری
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Shireen J. Mohammed
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
